For family offices, foundations and zakat funds

From a good intention to a giving programme you can defend.

A twelve-step method that turns what a family or funder wants into a written policy, a scorecard every grant is judged against, and a record of what the money achieved.

The method

Stage one finds the intent. Stage two runs the programme.

Stage oneFind the intent, choose the direction
01Hear the intention in your own words
02Map the money and who decides
03Each family member's interests, separately
04Past giving as evidence
05Constraints: tax, scrutiny, succession, faith
06Force the choice to one direction
Stage twoFund, manage and evaluate
07Grant-making policy and criteria
08Vehicle and tax route
09Source, score and diligence charities
10Award and contract
11Monitor and report
12Evaluate and revise for the next round

Where zakat or waqf is involved, religious-compliance governance runs through every step: the category identified, the funds ring-fenced, and distribution reported separately. Conflicts are declared and recorded, and every round leaves an audit trail.

How a family's broad intention narrows, step by step, into criteria every grant is scored against01–02Intention andthe money03–04Each person,past giving05Constraints06One direction07Criteria everygrant meets
Stage one narrows a broad intention into criteria, one step at a time. “All of them” is not an answer.
Steps 7 to 12 form a cycle: each round's evaluation revises the policy for the next07Policy08Vehicle09Select10Award11Monitor12EvaluateEach roundimproves the next
Stage two is a cycle: the evaluation of each round revises the policy for the next.
What you receive

Documents your board, your family and the regulator can read

DocumentWhat it settlesStep
Funder profileWhat the family wants, who decides and what rules a route out1–6
Grant-making policyMandate, outcomes, what you will and will not fund, grant size, risk appetite7
Structure and tax noteThe right vehicle, chosen after the purpose, with a qualified adviser's sign-off8
Scored shortlistCandidates ranked against your criteria, with proportionate due diligence9
Grant agreementsConditions and tranches. Nothing released before signature10
Portfolio report and evaluationWhat each grant achieved, and what changes for the next round11–12
Case study

NAS Foundation: from a family's informal waqf to a registered foundation in six months

The situation

A family had been giving generously for over a year through a waqf hosted by another charity. That arrangement was ending. Grants had been committed but only about half drawn down, most grantees had not yet reported, and the family wanted its own vehicle and a clearer direction.

What we did

Workshops with the family on vision, values and goals. Their past grants narrowed to six giving categories. Zakat separated from general giving. A choice between a registered charity and a private structure, then a CIO, with a donor-advised fund alongside for shorter-term giving. Board and grantee reporting templates, and a funding guide for the committee.

What changed

NAS Foundation was registered with the Charity Commission within six months of the first workshop, for less than the legal fees quoted. It now has a board, a disbursement committee with quarterly reporting, and a chief executive to run it. I stayed on as an adviser to the board.

Are you a charity?

Strategy, governance, crisis support and coaching for boards and chief executives

Work for charities →
Begin

Step one is a conversation.

Tell me what you are trying to decide. I will reply personally within two working days.

Kashif Shabir, Founder and Principal Consultant

I use what you send only to reply to you. See the privacy notice.